INDIA’S ROLE IN THE NEW WORLD ORDER

With every passing year, India is making an increasing mark on the world’s economic and political system.
In July 2008, India, together with China, blocked a deal in the World Trade Organisation talks, provoking
their collapse (though the US must share the blame for that outcome). Over the past two years Indian
companies have bought Europe’s two biggest steel-makers, Arcelor and Corus. Many European and
American IT firms have relocated large parts of their operations to India. Indian diplomacy is increasingly
active in Africa, Central Asia and South East Asia.
India’s increasing global influence has been driven by rapid economic growth. But India’s leaders should not
assume that future economic success is a given. They must overcome crucial challenges such as inadequate
infrastructure, poor outcomes in health and education, and dire rural poverty. If we assume that the
politicians take enough of the right decisions to ensure that India remains a rising power, what will be its
impact on the world’s economic and political systems? The answer is far from clear. India’s leaders proclaim
their support for the principles of multilateralism. But reality often fails to match rhetoric. Like most of the
other great powers in the world today, India is capable of acting multilaterally, unilaterally or bilaterally.
At the United Nations, India has a reputation for being one of the less constructive members. It sometimes
reacts in a negative or hostile manner to the initiatives of others, and does not often take its own initiatives.
Evidently, so long as India is denied a permanent seat on the UN Security Council (UNSC), its officials will
have an excuse for occasionally taking the UN less seriously than some others would wish.
In its own neighbourhood, India has no compunction about acting unilaterally, as it did when it sent forces
into Sikkim and Goa (both now part of India, in the 1960s), Bangladesh (in the 1970s) and Sri Lanka (in
the 1980s). Today, India’s government has its own policy on Myanmar, namely to boost Indian influence in
the country and not to criticise the regime, and it is not enthusiastic about tackling the problems of
Myanmar in a multilateral framework.
Some US commentators, like Robert Kagan, predict that the world’s democracies will team up to confront
the more authoritarian countries, like China and Russia. But India does not want to be part of an anti-China
coalition, or a league of democracies. Indeed, it has seldom allowed its democratic political system to
influence its foreign policy. If India does have a natural preference in international relations, it is to deal
with other powers bilaterally. The fact that India is large gives it weight in its bilateral relations, notably
with China, Russia and the US.
Although India does not want to be part of an axis of democracies, the most significant shift in its foreign
policy over the past two decades has been the rapprochement with the United States. Traditionally, the focus
of India’s foreign policy was non-alignment, but a non-alignment that left it much closer to the Soviet Union
and its allies than the US. Several factors explain the greater warmth towards Washington

:
H The collapse of the Soviet Union and the relative weakness of Russia since then;

H Growing economic ties between the US and India, particularly in the IT industries;
Centre

H The burgeoning educational and familial links between the two countries; many bright young Indians
aspire to study at US universities, and some of those who go stay; and

H Growing worries in India about the rise of Chinese power; as a result, many Indian leaders favour
closer ties with the US.

Thickening ties between the US and Indian security and political establishments led to the nuclear deal
between the governments of Manmohan Singh and George W Bush, which at the time of writing seems
likely to go through, after several years’ delay (it has passed the Indian parliament, the International Atomic
Energy Agency and the Nuclear Suppliers Group, but not yet the US Congress). This deal will remove
various sanctions against India’s nuclear industry and allow the country to import uranium for peaceful
purposes; in return, India will put its civilian nuclear facilities under international inspection.
The Indian left had long opposed this bargain, on the grounds that it would give outsiders control over
nuclear facilities and make India dependent on the US. The leading opposition party, the BJP, also opposed
it, but for tactical rather than substantive reasons. Yet when the Nuclear Suppliers Group approved the deal
in September, it set off a wave of nationalist pride: India was getting special arrangements that no other
nuclear power that had refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty had ever been granted, or was
likely to be granted. The Indians saw that because their country was an emerging great power they were
getting exceptional treatment.
Anti-Americanism remains a potent force in India, not only within the Communist parties but also in the
left wing intelligentsia and some universities. But public opinion tends to be broadly pro-American, as are
the political leaders of the two main parties, the governing Congress and the BJP. Meanwhile in the US, the
leaderships of the Republican and Democratic parties both support close ties with India.
Few Indians want to be used as a pawn by the US in an effort to ‘contain’ China. And few think that,
because India is a democracy, it should line up with other democracies against autocracies. Yet the friendly
relations with Washington have affected India’s relations with China.
At the level of political and business leaders, Indians talk up the relationship with China, stressing the
growing trade ties between the two countries. But in the Indian military establishment and among foreign
affairs commentators, and among some sections of the general public, there are growing concerns about the
rise of China. In ‘Rivals’, a recent book on the triangular relationship between India, China and Japan, Bill
Emmott observes that for the first time in its history, Asia contains three powerful and assertive states at
the same time. “A new power game is under way, in which all must seek to be as friendly as possible to all,
for fear of the consequences if they are not, but in which the friendship is only skin-deep.”
Indians are concerned about a series of unresolved border disputes with their giant neighbour. China
occupies several parts of what India claims is its territory. And China claims a whole state of India –
Arunachal Pradesh – as its own. This series of disputes was supposed to be resolved during a visit to Delhi
by President Hu Jintao in 2006. But something went wrong and a comprehensive deal on border disputes
was never signed. Each side says the other was unwilling to compromise. Since then China has criticised
Singh for visiting Arunachal Pradesh, and refused visas to government officials born in the state.
Whatever the truth about the diplomacy surrounding this border dispute, the perception of many Indians
is that China has taken a tougher line on the border in the past couple of years. In Delhi, some analysts
believe that India is paying a price for its closer relationship with Washington. If that is the case, China’s
tactics may be ineffective, since they are stoking up fears of Beijing in Delhi. On a visit to the Indian capital
in early 2008, this author noticed how concerns about the rise of China had grown since his previous visit,
in late 2005.
The Indians who worry most about China are military leaders and strategic thinkers. They note its soaring
military budget, its armaments programmes and its ambitions to develop space weapons. And they are
anxious about China’s close relations with India’s neighbours, with whom India tends to get on rather badly.
Some Indian strategists fear ‘encirclement’ by China, via its relations with countries such as Sri Lanka,
Myanmar, Bangladesh, Nepal and Pakistan.
Such concerns explain India’s efforts to build close relations with Japan, Australia and Singapore (these
three countries, together with the US and India, have staged joint military exercises). They explain its charm
offensive in South East Asia, intended to prevent Chinese domination of the region. And they also account
for some of India’s ambition in Africa, where it worries that Chinese firms tend to outbid Indian ones to

win contracts to exploit natural resources. India hosted a summit for African leaders in New Delhi in April
2008, 18 months after China had hosted a similar gathering in Beijing.Trade between India and China
continues to boom, though the overall level ($36 billion in 2007) is less than that between India and the EU
(S56 billion in 2007) and much less than that between China and the EU (S301 billion in 2007). India’s
trade deficit with China in 2007 was $9 billion, and some Indians are increasingly concerned that while
China exports manufactured goods to India, exports to China add less value (about half of India’s exports
to China are iron ore).
Tensions between Delhi and Beijing are unlikely to lessen, unless they can somehow find an accommodation
on their border disputes. India is likely to maintain friendly relations with Washington, and that will
continue to cause concern in Beijing. However, if China took a more positive attitude to reform of the UN
Security Council, so that Japan and India could become permanent members, it would help to create a
positive climate in India-China relations (when in Beijing last summer, this author picked up hints that
Chinese leaders are rethinking their attitude to UNSC reform).
India’s relationship with Russia is much less important than it was during the Cold War. There is very little
non-military trade between the two. India continues to buy Russian armaments, but the military ties seem
to be declining in importance. India sometimes wants US weapons in preference to those offered by Russia,
which does not go down well in Moscow, and the two sides have been sparring over the price of an aircraft
carrier that Russia is due to sell to India. One problem for the economic relationship is the lack of an
overland route for trade between them (Pakistan does not allow transit). Politically, relations between India
and Russia remain quite good. Some Indian strategic thinkers see Russia as a potential element in their
strategy for preventing Chinese dominance of Asia.
India’s relations with the EU have been mainly focused on the burgeoning trade and investment relationship.
But not many Indians see the EU as a strategic partner, largely because of its inability to reach a united
position on the issues that matter to India, such as reform of the UNSC and the India-US nuclear deal (for
this author’s analysis of the EU-India relationship, see ‘Four pillars for an EU-India partnership’ in the CER
bulletin, June/July 2008).
So far, Indian diplomacy has been much more concerned with these key bilateral relationships than with the
multilateral system. India has not yet displayed any willingness to sign up to a quantitative reduction in
carbon emissions in the post-Kyoto system that is likely to emerge after 2012. And as already remarked,
India has contributed to the demise of the Doha round of WTO talks by resisting a reduction of industrial
tariffs and farm protection.

Like China and Russia, India is a strong supporter of the principal of non-interference, and reluctant to

embrace the concept of humanitarian intervention. India has not been active in trying to reshape global
institutions such as the UN, the IMF, the World Bank and the G8. However, India is one of the biggest
providers of peacekeepers to the UN. Perhaps, when India is – as it must be, one day – admitted to the
UNSC and the body that replaces the G8, it will start to take on a greater sense of responsibility for
global governance. In the long run, India would benefit from a stronger and more effective rules-based
international system.

Chinese Secret Society Challenges Illuminati

By Henry Makow PhD
6-30-7

 

A Chinese secret society with 6 million members, including 1.8 million Asian gangsters and 100,000 professional assassins, have targeted Illuminati members if they proceed with world depopulation plans, according to Tokyo-based journalist Benjamin Fulford, 46.   They contacted Fulford, a Canadian ex pat, after he warned that the Illuminati plan to reduce the Asian population to just 500 million by means of race-specific biological weapons.   "The Illuminati, with the exception of Japan, is very much a white man's game," Fulford says.   The secret society confirmed Fulford's information and asked him for advice. He provided a list of 10,000 people associated with the Illuminati, mainly members of the Bilderberg, CFR and Skull and Bones. Neo Cons are also high priority targets.   "I have been promised that not a single person will die if they negotiate in good faith," Fulford says.         Fulford is the former Asian Pacific bureau chief for Forbes magazine. He quit in disgust when Forbes refused to run a damaging story about one of its advertisers. Fulford has since written 15 books in Japanese. His most recent is a scathing dissection of the 9-11 Hoax.   Fulford says Japan has been controlled in secret by the Illuminati through the use of murder and bribery. Underground sources tell him the Americans have murdered over 200 Japanese politicians and influential citizens since the end of WW2.   Among the victims are former Prime Ministers Tanaka, Takeshita, Ohira and Obuchi. They were all murdered using a special drug that induces strokes. The Illuminati have been warned that the Chinese secret society will not tolerate any more murders. It has also extended its protection to truth seekers in the West.   ANCIENT SECRET SOCIETY   The Chinese Secret Society is called the "The Green and the Red Societies," Fulford says.   It "can be found in the history books. When the Manchus invaded China in 1644 the Ming army became an underground society aimed at overthrowing the Qing (Manchu) and restoring the Ming. They supported the Boxer Rebellion but were put down by imperialist powers. Later, with the help of overseas Chinese and the Japanese imperial family, the society managed to overthrow the last Emperor and install Sun Yat Sen in his place. They last appear in the history books as the Green Gang and the Red Gang that fiercely fought the Communists in Shanghai in the 1940's. They were defeated by the Communists in 1949 and once again became an underground organization."   "Since 1949 they have steadily increased their influence throughout China and the rest of the world. They have members at the very highest levels of the Chinese government but they are by nature anti-establishment, and are not an official Chinese government organization...   "The society has deep roots in Japan because of the link between Yakuza crime gangs and the Japanese imperial family. The Japanese imperial family are descended from 6th century Korean invaders. The original invaders had trouble putting down the native Jomon peoples so they brought over a tough, warlike minority people from the Asian mainland. These are the ancestors of the Yakuza. They have historically been used for secret work and for jobs like collecting taxes. When the Japanese decided to help overthrow the last Chinese dynasty, they used the Yakuza as a go-between with the Chinese secret society, many of whose members were gangsters. To this day many of the senior leaders of this group are actually Japanese, not Chinese.   "It must be made very clear though that it is not a crime gang. Although many members are Triad and Yakuza members, over 2/3 thirds of the members are intellectuals such as university professors, researchers and government bureaucrats. Each member earns their own living and membership in the society is like belonging to an emergency fire brigade. Their book of rules reads like a book of ethics filled with instructions to do things like help the weak, fight injustice, help your comrades etc."   "They approached me and asked if they could help after I made a speech in Tokyo describing the Bush regimes' use of race-specific biological weapons. For me it was like a ghost from the history books appearing right in front of me. At first I thought of silly things like having them play 911 truth videos in Chinatowns around the world. However, then I remembered the scene from the movie Kill Bill where Uma Thurman snatches out her opponent's eye. I soon realized these people could save the world by directly attacking the eye at the top of the pyramid on the one-dollar bill."   "Think about it, the Illuminati and their top servants have a total membership of about 10,000 whereas the Chinese group has over 6 million members. That is 600 to one odds. Furthermore, the 6 million have the names and addresses of the 10,000 while the 10,000 do not know who or where the 6 million are."   FULFORD ON THE ILLUMINATI   "Below is a brief a summary of the intelligence I have received from sources including: former Japanese Prime Ministers, senior Yakuza gangsters, senior Japanese Freemasons, Western intelligence agencies etc.   "First the Illuminati are really inbred families of European and North American traditional aristocracy and banking families. They control the U.S., England, Europe (except for Scandinavian countries, Germany and Italy; Italy kicked them out in the 1970's),Japan, Africa, Iran, Canada and Mexico. They do not control China, Russia (Putin kicked them out for the first time since 1917), India, South East Asia, South America, Cuba etc.   "Their goal is to create a world government. Until 2 years ago the plan was the New World Order. That was outlined pretty clearly in the Project for a New American Century. However, with the debacle in Iraq, the secret government of the West changed to a new plan that is a world government based on the EU. To do this they will sabotage the U.S. economy.   "However, there is a big schism in the secret government. Jay Rockefeller and Philip Rothschild support one faction, the Global Warming Faction. Opposing them is the War on Terrorism Faction supported by David Rockefeller and the JP Morgan descendants (Bush, Harriman, Walker etc.). The warming people want to sell 500 nuclear power plants to China and a similar amount to the rest of the world. The terrorism guys want to keep U.S. dominance by maintaining control over oil. Putin was a huge setback for them.   "They are also neo-Nazis who want to reduce the amount of colored people in the world by at least half through disease, starvation and war. The Chinese secret society got wind of this and is preparing to stop them."   GERMANY AND SCANDINAVIA NOT ILLUMINATI?   I challenged Fulford on Germany, Italy, Scandinavia and possibly Russia not being controlled by the Illuminati. He replied that "the quality of my intelligence varies":   "I can say with certainty that China, Russia and India are free. When Putin kicked out Nieslev and Bereshovsky and arrested Khordokovsky, he basically kicked the Rockefellers and Rothschilds out of Russia. I have good Russian sources and am confident Putin is a nationalist who is fighting the Illuminati with all his might. When ex-NSA chief Bobby Inman spoke at the Foreign Correspondent's Club of Japan on June 26th he made it very clear he expected a protracted struggle with Russia.   "India kicked them out in Ghandi's day and they have never been allowed back. Having liberated themselves after 300 years of Illuminati (East India Company) rule, they do not intend to let themselves fall under their control again.   "There have been many attempts by the Illuminati to infiltrate and dominate China. They financed Chairman Mao but he then kicked them out in the 1960's (that is why China and the USSR nearly went to war then). They are now trying to create a financial crisis in China that would open the way for them to infiltrate the Chinese financial system. They will not succeed. Italy basically purged itself during the big P2 Masonic lodge scandal back in the 80's and re-infiltration has only been partly successful. Germany is part of the Nato alliance and is thus indirectly controlled. There is a powerful branch of the Rothschild family operating there.   "However, Germany does not appear on a top-secret Illuminati power flow chart I have obtained. As far as Iran is concerned, I know they financed Ayatollah Khomeini and Iran appears on the flow chart I have. My understanding is they want to provoke a conflict between Islam and the West so they can consolidate their control over the Muslim and Christian worlds before finishing world conquest by taking over China and India."   CONCLUSION   Fulford says a meeting is being arranged with Russia's Vladimir Putin to make sure the KGB also cooperates in this plan to snatch the eye out of the pyramid.   "So far, I have told the Illuminati that they are no longer allowed to murder Japanese politicians. I now plan to extend this protection to all politicians in the West. If the Illuminati assassinate or attempt to assassinate Ron Paul, Barak Obama or any politician, may God have mercy on their souls."   "Since I am a peace-loving, laid-back Canadian suddenly put in a situation of great responsibility, I feel I must act as a servant of the weakest people and creatures on the planet. I have also been negotiating in secret with the Illuminati in the hopes of arranging for them to cede power without any bloodshed in exchange for a general amnesty.   "I do believe we now have a real chance to end the New World Order and start the New Age. The New Age would be one where war, poverty and environmental destruction would only be found in the history books."   I applaud Benjamin Fulford's courage, idealism and defiance. However, he is new to this subject and may have been mislead. He shouldn't use Illuminati terminology like "New Age." The Illuminati control the central banks of Russia, China, India and Venezuela. They control the EU. Germany may not appear on the Illuminati chart because it is at the top. Barak Obama is a Zionist stooge. The Illuminati Li Ka-Shing (and family) has had a major role in China. Heck, the Communists are Illuminati. I thought the Illuminati controlled organized crime. I can't imagine a genuinely benevolent secret society. It would be encouraging if this were one.   It's possible Fulford is sincere but is being used to confuse and/or create divisions. Possibly they want to ramp up domestic terrorism as an excuse for martial law. Now, Orientals as well as Muslims could be on the watch list. This Chinese society is challenging the traitorous Western Establishment. We're talking about the State apparatus! So please be critical. It may or may not be true. Time will tell.   In any case, it's time we refused to bow down to tyranny and called a spade a spade.   Imagine, in Japan he writes the truth in the mainstream media! Maybe some day, we'll do that in America. Benjamin Fulford is an inspiration and he deserves our thanks.

MJ was killed

One week after Los Angeles police confirmed that investigators had not ruled out homicide in the death of Michael Jackson, the late singer's older sister, La Toya Jackson, reveals that she suspects he was murdered, the U.K.'s Mail On Sunday reports.

"I believe Michael was murdered," she said. "I felt that from the start. Not just one person was involved, rather it was a conspiracy of people. He was surrounded by a bad circle. Michael was a very meek, quiet, loving person. People took advantage of that. People fought to be close to him, people who werent always on his side."



---------------------------------------- --

Some artists are Anti-New World Order as well, such as Tupac, Bob Marley and Michael Jackson, some are just puppets, a tool for brainwashing and manipulating people. Illuminati self-expose themselves to a certain extent, because they believe it gives them power. This is also why Washington DC's design is full of Satanic symbols. Michael Jackson was murdered because he was going to expose a "conspiracy". There is a video of him saying this, search for it.

Anit Illuminati Celebs

When you see that title, you suddenly realize how hard it is to think of one. Princess Diana, DEAD, JFK, DEAD, Michael Jackson (according to some people), DEAD (or perhaps escaping a certain fate? One can only hope).

Does anybody know any real celebrities that are anti-illuminati? They don't have to be blatantly against it, but they have to be.. well good. You know, The Black Eyed Peas, I thought they could be but it seems they may have succum to temptation. I just remember their song, Where is the Love? It may not have been super descriptive, but I thought it had a really good message. On top of that, there is a SECRET BONUS TRACK in NON AMERICAN VERSIONS of it called Third Eye. Also about, well good things. A quote from it; "You can fool me once, but you can't fool me two times, cause I got three eyes, one on the left side, one on the right side, and one up on the inside, I can see you outside."

Maybe I'm just dreaming, but I really hope that the B.E.P. have good intentions. Or at least had at one point.